Illustrative image
Illustrative image
THE FIRST STEP TO YOUR CONSULTATION
What matters to you? Your wishes set the direction. Together, we explore what suits you and what is medically possible.
You can choose more than one.
Discomfort Personal wellbeing Confidential questions
01 Your wishes 02 Contact Treatment at a glance Duration 2 h Recovery time Depends on the procedure and individual healing Treatment interval Only after a further medical assessment Treatment location Confirmed individually with your appointment
Mc Aesthetics · KNOWLEDGE
Research, explained A relevant original study, its measurements and its limits. The findings describe studied groups, not your personal outcome.
How the study was designed 49 treatment group 39 comparison group Study design diagram · not a success rate
Veale D et al. · 2014
Interpreting the evidence This prospective labiaplasty comparison assessed satisfaction and psychosexual aspects. Follow-up losses and personal factors limit interpretation.
Patient survey with possible selection and response bias. Satisfaction alone does not capture all risks.
Source & context Psychosexual outcome after labiaplasty: a prospective case-comparison study.
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2297-2
Read the original study↗ Before treatment Illustrative image Aesthetic intimate surgery belongs in experienced hands. A professional, detailed consultation beforehand is essential.
Special considerations Intimate Design encompasses different procedures for the intimate area, planned individually. The combination depends on symptoms, anatomy and personal wishes, and requires qualified medical assessment.
5.00 / 5 4 patient accounts Ich möchte Anonym bleiben! Ich kann diesen Arzt sehr weiterempfehlen und bin wirklich sehr glücklich und zufrieden mit dem Ergebnis Anonym Personal account · Original text Treatment & trust · Organisation & care · Practice & accessibility
Read patient accounts & 14 detailed criteria + Patient reviews Patient reviews
5.00 / 5
4 star ratings · 4 patient accounts
Published accounts from 2019–2020
A closer look at the ratings Grading scale: 1 = very good, 6 = unsatisfactory. Missing responses are excluded from the average.
01 Treatment & trust +
Treatment outcome4 responses 1.0
Information and explanation4 responses 1.0
Trust4 responses 1.0
Time taken4 responses 1.0
Friendliness4 responses 1.0
Competence4 responses 1.0 02 Organisation & care +
Waiting time for an appointment4 responses 1.0
Waiting time at the practice4 responses 1.0
Consultation hours4 responses 1.0
Care and support4 responses 1.0 03 Practice & accessibility +
In-practice entertainment4 responses 1.2
Practice facilities4 responses 1.0
Parking4 responses 1.5
Public transport access4 responses 1.0 Search reviews Filter by starsAll star ratings 5 stars 4 stars 3 stars 2 stars 1 star No star rating Sort byNewest first Oldest first Lowest rating first Highest rating first
Genital surgery ↗
Ich möchte Anonym bleiben! Ich kann diesen Arzt sehr weiterempfehlen und bin wirklich sehr glücklich und zufrieden mit dem Ergebnis
Anonym Personal account · Original text
View detailed ratings+ Grading scale: 1 = very good, 6 = unsatisfactory. Missing responses are excluded from the average.
Treatment & trust
Treatment outcome 1.0
Information and explanation 1.0
Trust 1.0
Time taken 1.0
Friendliness 1.0
Competence 1.0 Organisation & care
Waiting time for an appointment 1.0
Waiting time at the practice 1.0
Consultation hours 1.0
Care and support 1.0 Practice & accessibility
In-practice entertainment 1.0
Practice facilities 1.0
Parking 1.0
Public transport access 1.0
Genital surgery ↗
Sehr diskrete und schnelle Behandlung und Beratung
Anonym Personal account · Original text
View detailed ratings+ Grading scale: 1 = very good, 6 = unsatisfactory. Missing responses are excluded from the average.
Treatment & trust
Treatment outcome 1.0
Information and explanation 1.0
Trust 1.0
Time taken 1.0
Friendliness 1.0
Competence 1.0 Organisation & care
Waiting time for an appointment 1.0
Waiting time at the practice 1.0
Consultation hours 1.0
Care and support 1.0 Practice & accessibility
In-practice entertainment 1.0
Practice facilities 1.0
Parking 1.0
Public transport access 1.0
Genital surgery ↗
Sehr diskrete und schnelle Behandlung und Beratung
Anonym Personal account · Original text
View detailed ratings+ Grading scale: 1 = very good, 6 = unsatisfactory. Missing responses are excluded from the average.
Treatment & trust
Treatment outcome 1.0
Information and explanation 1.0
Trust 1.0
Time taken 1.0
Friendliness 1.0
Competence 1.0 Organisation & care
Waiting time for an appointment 1.0
Waiting time at the practice 1.0
Consultation hours 1.0
Care and support 1.0 Practice & accessibility
In-practice entertainment 1.0
Practice facilities 1.0
Parking 1.0
Public transport access 1.0
Genital surgery ↗
Ich möchte Anonym bleiben! Ich kann diesen Arzt sehr weiterempfehlen und bin wirklich sehr glücklich und zufrieden mit dem Ergebnis
Anonym Personal account · Original text
View detailed ratings+ Grading scale: 1 = very good, 6 = unsatisfactory. Missing responses are excluded from the average.
Treatment & trust
Treatment outcome 1.0
Information and explanation 1.0
Trust 1.0
Time taken 1.0
Friendliness 1.0
Competence 1.0 Organisation & care
Waiting time for an appointment 1.0
Waiting time at the practice 1.0
Consultation hours 1.0
Care and support 1.0 Practice & accessibility
In-practice entertainment 2.0
Practice facilities 1.0
Parking 3.0
Public transport access 1.0 No reviews match this selection.
Reset filters Read more reviews ↓ Source and context+ These reviews were submitted by clients after a visit and carried over from the previous Mc Aesthetics review system. Star and criterion averages use recorded responses; missing values are not filled in. The original texts describe personal experiences.
These accounts refer to the treatment date and team at that time.
From the previous Mc Aesthetics review system · 2019–2020
All patient reviews ↗ These accounts refer to the treatment date and team at that time.