IAGS · Scientific position article · Peer-reviewed
Trust through independence
Medical responsibility, patient autonomy and the separation of advice, treatment and outcome assessment
Relevance to Mc Aesthetics
The article discusses Mc Aesthetics in relation to structured clarification of personal wishes before a consultation. It considers how goals, expectations and features a person wishes to preserve can be documented clearly, and how this preparation supports an informed decision.
Section 6.4 · Narrative evidence synthesis and analysis of medical governance models
The organisational model discussed in the article
Conceptual diagram based on IAGS draft 0.1 (30 September 2026). A, B and C are different people with separate financial interests. A and C offer the patient no subsequent elective aesthetic treatment. This is an organisational proposal, not an empirically validated causal pathway; necessary care and aftercare remain available.
Source: IAGS position article · Figure 3.
The article presents the position of the IAGS initiative. The companies are selected examples; this is not an independent provider ranking.
Conflicts of interest: The authors have submitted declarations and report no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.